What Is The Peer-Review Of A Manuscript?
- Peer-Review is a process in which the Manuscript proposed for the Publication of the Journal is assessed by a group of experts in the appropriate field.
- It can be said as a sign of recognition in one’s field.
Who is involved in the Process of Peer-Review?
- Experts in the appropriate field.
- Editorial Board Members.
Evaluation Stages
Initial Evaluation
- Read the Abstract & Conclusion.
- Skip the Figures, Data, Tables.
In-Depth Evaluation
- Read the entire script
- Note the details
- Getting Answer to these Questions
- Is the quality of the manuscript good for a conclusion?
- Is the experimental design appropriate?
- Is there any non-relevant data?
How does Peer-Review Work?
- The Research Scholars writes a Paper & Submits the Manuscript to the Academic Journal that publishes similar or related types of works.
- The Journal Editor reads the Manuscript and decides whether it meets the criteria for Publication or not. If it is rejected, the manuscript goes back to the Researcher with a polite rejection letter. If it meets the criteria, then the Manuscript is accepted and is sent to the scientific community who will read it as well.
- The reviewers read the manuscript to evaluate in terms of its purpose, scope, thesis, outcome and ask questions such as
- Is the topic worth investigating?
- Are relevant sources being used?
- Does the evidence support the thesis?
- Is the thesis clearly and convincingly argued?
- Is the work original?
- Once the reviewers have finished reading the manuscript, they send their comments to the editor, who in turn, sends it to the writer another letter that will either accept the paper without revisions or will provide comments and ask for revisions based on the peer reviewers’ evaluation of the work.
- Once the paper is revised to the satisfaction of the editor and the reviewers take several revisions, the article is published.
- When using Peer-reviewed articles for research papers and assignments, can use the best data or information available upon which to base your work.
Peer Review Methodology
What are the Questions to be focused on while Peer-Reviewing?
Title
- Is the title match with the Manuscript?
- Are the major findings mentioned in the Manuscript?
- Is the conclusion overstated?
Abstract
- Can the abstract stand alone?
Intro
- Is the Intro brief?
- Does the intro have the aim or objective of the Research?
Methods
- Are the methods appropriate?
- Is the statistical analysis provided?
Results
- Is the paper within the scope of the Research?
- Does the paper address the important & interesting question?
- Is the Manuscript readable?
Over-view of Peer-Review
- The manuscript should be kept confidential.
- Feedback should be constructive and must include reasons to support the comments.
How is Peer-Review beneficial in Academic Writing?
- Improves Writing & Critical Thinking Skills
- Develops Collaborative Learning
- Encourages the writer to perform better
- Saves time for Researchers
- Ensure Quality Research is Published
The Peer-Reviewer needs to pay attention to evaluate the Manuscript Readability such as
- Is the manuscript readable?
- Are the sentences easy to read?
- Are the sentences grammatically correct?
Conclusion
Peer-Review is a crucial learning process. A Good Peer-Review should be
- Focused – Main areas should be addressed
- Constructive – Identification of the Problems clearly
- Structured – Systematic Approach to the Manuscript
- Polite & Professional Feedback
- Listing major strength & weakness
- Recommend changes to improve