6 Ways to Increase Manuscript Acceptance

The standard of your scientific activity is the publication of your study. Making your papers understandable and informative so that your peers can read and profit from them is the key to getting them accepted. Although scientific quality is paramount, clear and concise writing can often mean the difference between acceptance and rejection.


What are the Effective Ways to Increase the chance of acceptance of the manuscript?


Journal Selection

The journal you choose has a significant impact on how quickly you’ll be published. Check the spectrum of relevant publications while your study is being prepared for publication or even before. High Impact Journals can help you increase the number of times your research is published.


Follow the author guidelines. 

Make sure your manuscript is formatted correctly for the journal you’re submitting it to. Similarly, if you submit a manuscript to a new journal after it has been rejected by one, make sure to change your cover letter to reflect the new journal. When a journal editor sees one of their competitors’ names on the cover letter, it immediately turns them off, and it makes you appear sloppy and careless with details, which is not a good thing.


Write transparently.

Unfortunately, imprecise wording can hinder the publication of a well-designed study with significant consequences. Editors and reviewers, in particular, may struggle to comprehend the content and may have a negative prejudice against poorly written papers, making rejection more likely. For non-native English speakers, this is a challenging obstacle to overcome.


Check Plagiarism

Most submitted manuscripts are checked for plagiarism to guarantee that no already published content is published. Remember that you cannot just cut and paste words or chunks from previous papers, even if you repeat methods or other material from your previous works, because this is considered a kind of plagiarism known as self-plagiarism. Ensure that any borrowed information, including your own, is accompanied by a reference or reworded.


Write Clear Cover Letter

While a weak cover letter will not necessarily reduce your chances of being published, a strong cover letter will. Write a thoughtful cover letter that helps the editor rapidly grasp the impact of your research and how it will revolutionize thinking in your industry, rather than an introductory, generic cover letter that satisfies the bare-bones standards. Improve your chances of the editor being interested in your book by producing a clear, concise, and appealing cover letter.


Keep track of the journal.

If you submitted your article to a journal but have yet to hear back, you should contact the editor to inquire about the status of your submission. Because the time it takes for a journal to make a decision varies by field and journal, you may wish to check with colleagues or go to the journal’s website to see if you’ve been waiting longer than typical.








The pinnacle of your scientific activity is the publication of your study. Making your papers understandable and informative so that your peers can read and profit from them is the key to getting them accepted.

Duplicate or Simultaneous Submission and Publication

It is mandatory for authors to agree with the publication ethics while submitting their research papers for peer review to a journal. The articles submitted for publication must be original and must not have been submitted to any other publication. However, it is often seen that the authors disregard this requirement and submit the same research paper (or with minor modifications) to two or more journals. Like plagiarism, the duplicate submission can be of different types: exact duplicate, partial duplicate (substantial), or duplicate with minor changes (article title, references, or authors).

Issues with Duplicate Submission

Duplicate submission is an unethical practice and violates the copyright norm. It leads to the wastage of editorial and review resources. The publication record of the author includes misleading information. The same research paper appearing in two journals raises questions about the reputation and peer review policy of the journals. Another similar practice involves splitting up a single study to publish multiple articles (salami-slicing), to increase the number of publications.

Avoiding Redundant Publication

For authors: If the two research papers are not the exact copy of each other and the author wishes to submit them to two different journals, then the author must:

  • Disclose the details of each paper to both the journals
  • Inform both the handling editors (managing editors) that a similar research paper is under review in another journal (use cover letter to inform).
  • Explain the distinct difference between the two research papers and why two research papers were produced instead of one from the same topic
  • Do not replicate content from other published paper
  • Each paper must address separate research questions.


For journal’ reviewers:

  • Always use text-matching or plagiarism tools for screening redundant publication
  • Check the extent and nature of overlapping
  • Major overlapping: identical or very similar findings and/or evidence that authors have sought to hide redundancy e.g. by changing the title or author order or not citing previous papers)
  • Minor overlapping: overlapping in the methodology section or re-analysis of the data
  • Inform the editor about the redundant publication


Dealing with Dual Submissions

While working on two different manuscripts that use the same dataset, or if the article is going to be published in different languages, always let the editors know about the plans.

Contact corresponding author in writing, ideally enclosing signed authorship statement (or cover letter) stating that submitted work has not been published elsewhere and documentary evidence of duplication.

Contact author in neutral terms/proceeds with review expressing concern/explaining journal’s position. Explain that secondary papers must refer to the original and request a missing reference to the original and/or remove overlapping material.

In conclusion, ultimately, there’s no need to send out the same manuscript to multiple journals at once. It’s against most publishers’ policies and will only cause delays or even retractions.

Benefits of Open Access for Students

What is Open Access?

Open Access is the works that are available freely online. The various kinds of Open Access Content – Research Articles, Images, Videos, Open Educational Resources. In this users are free to retain, reuse, revise, remix and redistribute.

How Students Get Benefits from Open Access?

Students & Professors

  • The more open-access information there is, the more likely you Students to have free access to reference textbooks and journals.
  • Open Access takes one step closer to allowing students from other universities to legally share study materials.
  • It also gives students in developed countries access to study findings.
  • Due to the excessive cost of journal subscriptions, even the largest and most well-funded universities are unable to provide their students with full scholarly records.
  • Students attending smaller or less well-funded colleges and universities must make do with whatever access their library can provide. Community college students, who make up a sizable portion of higher education students, struggle even more.
  • Students in every discipline need access to the most recent studies to receive a comprehensive education in their field of study and to be able to jump right into work after graduation. Due to a lack of research resources, students must rely on readily available knowledge rather than the most applicable.
  • Open Access ensures that students receive the best possible education without being arbitrarily limited.
  • Open Access not only helps Students but also Professors. Professors who don’t have access to the most up-to-date information are unable to carry it into the classroom.
  • With science progressing at such a rapid rate, professors must have access to cutting-edge research and academic journals for teaching Students.
  • Colleges and universities in developing countries face far greater difficulties than their counterparts in the developed world in acquiring the most up-to-date academic literature, and also have inadequate library budgets. Open Access would vastly expand the amount of knowledge accessible to these students while also improving the quality of education available to millions of people.


Research Students

  • Many students, especially those in graduate school, seek degrees to become trained researchers. If they go on to become teachers, physicians, lawyers, or entrepreneurs, they will still need access to research to succeed. Students Access to papers disappears with their library card after they graduate. If they take a job at another university, that institution’s level of access will vary significantly from what they need.
  • Researchers in the developed world are unable to contribute to the advancement of science and the humanities because they lack access to relevant journals in their field. With Open Access, there’s no need to stress over whether you’re connected to the campus network or whether your library has a subscription. You have access to the internet from anywhere in the world if you’re online.
  • Open Access helps to lift the profile of research done in developed countries, both locally and internationally.



With Open Access, New concepts can be disseminated more quickly and broadly, triggering new research studies and providing a boost to awareness. Scientific research indicates that publishing in Open Access results in more citations and effects because of the global visibility without barriers.

Management of Multiple Projects In Medical Writing

What are Medical writing services?

Medical writing services deals with Medical Science which includes clinical research reports, content for healthcare blogs, newsletters, newspapers, and news. Writing a research procedure and/or a clinical study report (CSR) for a project is part of regulatory medical writing. In a Clinical Research Organization (CRO), a Regulatory Medical Writer is normally involved at the beginning (writing a study protocol) and/or end (writing a clinical study report (CSR)) of a project. When the team works together to reach critical deadlines at the start and end of a clinical trial, it may be the most difficult time for them.

 How to manage multiple projects efficiently in Medical Writing?

 Priority to Documents

Determine which documents are the most important and have the greatest effect on a report. Give them priority over those with the smallest effects.


Draw a timeline of all of the overlapping tasks. Manage the time efficiently by determining which documents are the most critical (and therefore have the greatest impact in a study) and which can be postponed with the least impact.

Document Completion Process

At the start of the research, explain the entire document completion process to the study team and ask them if any improvements need to be made. Show them how major changes, ad hoc evaluations, and other factors will impact schedules in vital QC time.

CSR Methodology

If the client has finalized the protocol and statistical analysis strategy, write the methods portion of the CSR. Do as much work as possible off the critical path.

Meeting with the Research team

Hold a results analysis meeting with the research team to show them how you expect to present the data while writing CSRs. This will help you understand exactly what the research team is looking for and how it should be portrayed.


If deadlines are approaching, make use of your colleagues. As the lead medical writer, you will, for example, write the efficacy findings more accurately when delegating a huge in-text table or the protection section to a colleague.


Call the research team for a live meeting and discussion once you’ve finished the first draft of your paper. Any changes in the timeline should be communicated to the QC and peer reviewers. If you want to deliver all of the documents on time, make sure that all of the testers are aware of when they must complete the work, how long it will take, and how urgent the project is.


Finally, no matter how much work you have, be frank with your clients; if they have unreasonable standards, work with them to improve them. Wait until you’ve received all of the client’s feedback before responding, and double-check that you know who the signatories are. A consumer is more likely to make changes to ensure that the document is delivered on time


When a team is dealing with several submissions in a short amount of time, or even simultaneous submissions, confusion about timetable organization, Medical Writing Publication can be dealt efficiently with the above steps.

What are the barriers to post-publication peer review?

Post-publication peer review – doing peer review after the publication of the manuscript. When a paper is published. Everyone in the community starts to read it and comment on it either in conferences or Journal Clubs. It is an informal way of doing Peer Review.

F1000, OpenReview, PubMed Commons, TrueReview, Pubpeer are some of the Post-publication Peer Review Platforms.

 Challenges of Post-publication peer review

Lack of Motivation towards Scientific Researches

Editorial control will always be a vital feature of every open peer review method, including PPPR, as we’ve previously reported. Editors are expected to seek peer feedback promptly (and often submit several reminder emails), as well as provide a sense of “prestige” for being asked to review an article, as a clear acknowledgment of your expertise in that area.

Too many choices – Many platforms and alternative methods of use in communicating reviews. It’s likely that various comments appear on different pages but not on others when multiple copies of a paper exist across multiple platforms. It’s also likely that researchers would experience plagiarism. This mode of communication is possibly more suitable when significant theoretical or methodological shortcomings in published studies have been discovered.


Allows unqualified referees to smear the Researcher’s original work with unfounded accusations, claims, and lies in the name of free speech.

Risk of non-constructive criticism

Some people may use PPPR to be intentionally confrontational in public, talking down to or intimidating their junior peers. As a result, any alternative or complementary system must mitigate or minimize this negative dynamic, ensure that an accountability process is built into and maintained, and ensure that marginalized groups are encouraged to participate.

 Solutions to Post-publication peer review

  • Offers Opportunities for Corrections Authors receive more Feedback from peers by posting papers online. This should lessen the agony of revise and re-submit.
  • Increases engagement of the Scientific Community for more recognition & career development.
  • Ensures openness by making the analysis publicly accessible to those involved in the study.
  • The technology has made it possible for Scientific Research Papers to be accessible always.
  • After reading the Research Paper, review comments can be posted immediately and shared on social media platforms.
  • Strength & Weakness of Scientific Papers is done real-time globally.



Peer review was established to ensure that research papers are well-documented and meet the scientific community’s general standards. However, another aim of peer review has always been to stimulate scientific debate. Post-Publication Peer review allows the broader community to discuss the article in greater depth, providing the open forum that peer review is designed to provide. Using this method would undoubtedly result in a conflict of interest. Peer review often prohibits discussion of a mainstream theory against a competing mainstream theory, and theoretical scientists are often denied the opportunity to do so. PPPR aims to make aspects of the daily research process more accessible to the public. It’s about bringing meaning to published research papers by using the evaluations and criticisms that researchers and others conduct.

Misconduct in Research Publication

The academic world is not without its flaws. Given the mad rush to get published and the number of publications being a measure of one’s acumen, it is not surprising that many authors often resort to some of the below-mentioned misconducts. However, it must also be remembered that often younger authors unwittingly fall prey to these same misconducts simply because they are too naïve or fail to take proper precautions.

Here are some of the top misconducts in research publication and tips on how to avoid them.

Plagiarism: Plagiarism is perhaps the most common and well-understood issue with the publication. It is also technically one of the most complicated to ascertain. Plagiarism refers to the inappropriate usage of other’s ideas or any intellectual property without explicit consent or attribution. Thus, if you pass off someone else’s words or works as your’s own, it is plagiarism.

However, what many young scholars miss out on is that even referring to some other study or project without proper attribution is also plagiarism, even if one does not try to pass it as one’s own idea. While citing an article, unless you quote the entire section under parentheses, you may be guilty of plagiarism. Technically, today in the publishing world it is accepted as a norm that if five consecutive words are the same as source material, it is considered plagiarism. Therefore, it is advised to be extremely careful even in the literature review section to avoid allegations of plagiarism.

Falsification: Data manipulation is one of the biggest problems of any research publication. More often than not, researchers resort to such measures to get more amicable results, to ensure their hypothesis is proven right, or simply to present a more robust and powerful finding than their peers. Technically, there can be 2 types of misconducts; fabrication of data in the form of generating fictitious data, or falsification in the form of selective choosing of data to suit one’s research objective. In either case, it is regarded as manipulation of falsification of data and is considered as grave misconduct.

Data duplication: This is misconduct often done unintentionally though there are instances when unscrupulous researchers do it on purpose. Technically, data duplication refers to creating exact copies same data, usually for back-up. However, in many research methodologies, especially those involving sampling or surveying, mishandling of data can lead to unintentional data duplication within the data set. Often this is done to artificially increase the total sample size, or to cover for failed experimentation. Data duplication leads to amplification of the results and in academic research it is considered a grave methodological error if done unintentionally and a form of data manipulation if done intentionally.

Unethical practices: unethical practices may include exposing individuals of groups to risks (say in medical experiments) without their knowledge, breach of individual privacy, non-anonymization of survey data, improper usage or disposal of hazardous materials, etc. Any research that violates any such norm, even unintentionally, is also considered as misconduct.

Decoding authorship: author, co-author, corresponding author

More often than not, a journal publication has attributions to multiple authors. However, when it comes to formal submissions, citation, and accreditation, the differences in the role played by the multiple collaborators need to be clarified; both amongst the authors themselves and between the authors and the journal to which they submit their article for publication.

Here are some factors to keep in mind when deciding on the authorship of an article publication.

Technically, the author is the one who is the principal architect of the article. Co-authors are those who work in tandem with the author to help them write the content. Co-authors are a kind of author who works with the main author and helps them give shape to the content as per the vision or ideation of the author.

There is often confusion about hierarchy and many suppose that the most senior colleague has to be the author while juniors join as co-authors. This is not necessarily always true. In some cases, when a senior scientist undertakes a major research project, they may ask their junior colleagues to help write an article even while the senior colleague is still the main architect of the entire project. In such cases, the senior colleague is the author while all juniors are co-authors.

However, there may also be situations where research scholars publish articles as part of their Ph.D. programs while their supervisors collaborate as co-authors. In such cases, the main author is still the research scholar who writes on his thesis work and the supervisor helps ensure the quality of work.

In the case of multi-disciplinary studies, two divergent subject experts may simultaneously develop an article with each working on the section specific to their field. They may mutually agree upon author co-authorship for such works.

Being a co-author does not mean one is absolved of all major responsibilities of the content or liabilities in case it is challenged. Most journals understand as a co-author one:

  • Has made significant contributions to the research and drafting of the article.
  • Has been actively engaged in drafting of the submitted manuscript, including revising or critically reviewing the submission.
  • Have agreed to submit to the journal for publication and thereby agrees to abide by all instructions for authors given by the journal.
  • Agrees to be accountable for the contents of the article and thereby shares the responsibility to respond to queries on the content along with the author.

Every journal submission requires the group of authors to identify the Corresponding author for the publication. The corresponding author is responsible for getting all approvals from fellow authors and is the principal point of contact for communicating with the journal. In the case of peer reviews, the journal will only communicate to the corresponding-author and in turn, it is the latter’s responsibility to respond back to the journal the collective opinion of the authors.

Either the author or co-author may nominate themselves as the corresponding author by mutual agreement unless the journal instructions specify otherwise.

How to Promote Your articles and Track them

Getting a journal publication is an achievement; but letting the world know about it is essential for career progression. In the academic world flooded with numerous publications, it is important to promote your work amongst your peers and professional colleagues.

At the same time, it is also important to keep track of the reach and impact of your article. The real merit of a publication is not just the number of reads but also number of citation and recall of the article.

Here are some important tools to promote your article and keep track of it.

  • Normally journals share pdf of published articles which one can share via mail to colleagues and targeted audiences. Do ensure to ask the journals to provide your e-mail id or professional account links in your profile. You can also share digital links of the articlewhich increases chances of clicks and thereby online readership of your article.
  • It is advisable to share printed copies of the article with seniors, peers and especially those whose articles you have used as citation in your own article,along with a short note of introduction or expressing gratitude, as the case may be. Sharing physical copies also raises chances of citation for your own article, and it is a good way of getting acquainted in the peer group.
  • Regularly update your university web page, your personal professional accounts or blogs with your publications. Share short briefs of your research with keywords. This will help your profile be highlighted in general Google searches on the field of you your research by other academicians unknown to you.
  • Use social media platforms for outreach. LinkedIn, Twitter posts or blogs are useful means of promoting one’s article. You can also post links of your article on general online platforms or blogs where you interact with other academicians for online discussions on research Use hashtags or keywords to link your article to relevant topics.
  • It is advisable to get an ORCID registration for yourself. ORCID or Open Research and Contributor ID is a unique ID for every individual which can then be used to track all publications and citation This helps avoid confusions over names, referencing, or mistaken identification. By registering and using an ORCID ID you can easily distinguish yourself and assure that your work is attributed only to yourself.
  • While there exist other platforms and databases which cover a portion of your total output (e.g. Scopus or Web of Science), or only certain types of outputs (e.g. journal articles), you can add all of your publications, works and activities to your ORCID record to create a comprehensive listing in one place, including outputs like datasets, peer review activities and more.

Besides accounts in such platforms, it is also advisable to create a simple Google alert for yourself. This is an easy tool to get records of which all digital platforms are best serving your purpose.


The double catastrophe of cardiovascular-pulmonary disorders

Darkness crippled in the lives of family members, with the sudden demise of the only son of the family, aged 38, years undergoing treatment for an interstitial lung disorder. The death report stated cardiac arrest not a pulmonary failure as the cause of untimely demise. This incidence like many more, hints the fine-tuning at the cellular-functional axis, amongst The MOST VITAL organs “Lungs & Heart” to support life.

Pulmonary cardiovascular disease

Both cardiovascular and pulmonary disease is the leading cause of deaths worldwide. Cardiovascular diseases developed in respiratory patients have a high mortality rate apart from affecting day to day lives. For instance, patients with lung fibrosis or COPD are more likely to die due to heart failure as compared to those with a pulmonary issue but no cardiac involvement”. The irony of the story is that the patient with lung disease is less likely to receive coronary revascularization or coronary artery bypass graft.  It is due to similar symptoms in both condition and complex management in the pretext of existing lung complications.

The dynamics of Heart Lung Reciprocity

Lungs and heart not only share the thoracic cavity in common but also are functionally interdependent. A load of transporting oxygen laden pure blood is a composite effort of both the organs. This is evident in heart diseases having breathlessness as a hallmark.

Pulmonary disease conditions such as ILD can exert backpressure to heart known as pulmonary arterial hypertension causing right-sided heart failure. Also, conditions like left-sided heart failure, mitral stenosis, myocardial infarction can cause pulmonary edema or waterlog in the lungs due to venous hypertension. Fluid accumulation in air sacs or obstruction in blood flow due to fibrosis leads to a build-up of arterial pressure resulting in morbidity due to heart collapse.


Advancement in medical and surgical intervention has undoubtedly increased life expectancy and strengthened emergency care. However, the major lacuna to date is the prognosis mystery regarding the unrevealing of complex lung disorders. The situation is highly alarming with the involvement of pumping organs, eventually leading to untimely catastrophe, known as DEATH.

Challenges Faced by Researchers in Developing Countries

Research is a scientific and systematic search for applicable evidence on a specific subject. It comprises crucial problems, framing hypothesis or recommended explanations; assembling, establishing and estimating data; making assumptions and reaching conclusions; and at last, wisely testing the conclusions to regulate whether they fit the formulating assumption.

In developing nations, research is in its incessant stage. Performing scientific study in emerging countries has numerous obstructions comprising deficiency of planning, moral and financial motivations, and lack of time available for research.

Below certain major and the most general challenges that a researcher in the developing country encounters are discussed:

  1. Nonexistence of Scientific Training

Due to the non-systemic nature of research methodology, numerous researchers, even their supervisors, carry out research without knowing the exact research methods. Before starting the research projects, researchers should be well equipped with all the methodological aspects.

  1. Financial issues

Funding can be insecure at times. A number of Ph.D. scholars depend on their parents or friends financially, which is tremendously worrying and traumatic to secure new funding. Preferably, the research supervisors should be available to support this. However, to overcome this problem it is advised that scholars should secure themselves financially in case of crisis.

  1. Lack of communication with the guide

Staying in contact with ideas and development is one of the problems for researchers in developing countries. It is essential for a researcher to have proper guidance on the research project. It is imperative to converse with the supervisor so as to clarify the doubts concerning the research topic and to learn more about your research topic.

  1. Proper Time management

It is better to perform fewer things in a perfect manner than numerous things full of mistakes. A proper timetable should be prepared and followed strictly by the Ph.D. candidate to avoid half-finished tasks management. This will help the candidates to be more organized and professional in their work field.

  1. Stress

Pursuing a doctorate can be highly nerve-wracking. To overcome this stressful life, below are the points that should be followed:

  • Seeking positive feedback
  • Acknowledging your achievements so far
  • Taking stock of your competencies
  • Trying out new things

Aside from humans, pets can get stressed too. The good thing is there is a list of CBD brands which are meant to alleviate their troubles.

  1. Lack of confidence

The absence of confidence is one of the most common problems among scientists in developing countries. Scientists with low self-confidence feel less stirred thus affecting the quality of the work.

  1. Problems associated with importation

In most developing countries the complications and cost of importing scientific equipment, instruments, and spare parts is a major limiting factor to scientific research.

  1. Library management

The proper management and functioning of the library are not adequate in numerous Universities in developing countries. To get appropriate books, journals, reports, etc., an ample amount of time and energy is spent.

In summary, scientific research is provided with a very low priority in the case of developing countries.