After a paper is submitted to a journal, it generally goes in for peer review analysis. But there are instances when the paper is rejected even before it reaches the peer review stage. This happens because the paper does not conform to the scope or the technical specifications of the concerned journal, and is therefore unilaterally rejected by the editor. In most high impact factor journals, about 5% of the submitted papers are accepted. It is very important to understand and analyse the possible reasons for rejection, so as to avoid any such issues in the future.
Related Posts
Present day research and issues related to it
Modern research has played a significant role in solving life’s mysteries, and has, paradoxically, sometimes added to them, a la the test tube baby and human cloning. With the advent of time, scientists will delve deeper to deliver landmark results in many areas, such as discovering cures for hitherto untreatable diseases, or preventing a cyclone before it […]
Tips for Formatting Works Cited Page in MLA Style
MLA-style formatted research or academic papers should have a ‘Works Cited’ page. This works cited page in MLA style should begin as a separate page at the last part of the paper. Follow these basic tips to learn the proper and correct formatting of the Works Cited page in MLA style. Share via: Facebook […]
How to retain customers? Use AI to predict and prevent churn.
Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University have developed a new AI tool called ChurnGuard that can predict customer churn with high accuracy. This is a game-changer for businesses, as it allows them to identify customers at risk of churning and take proactive steps to retain them. ChurnGuard uses a variety of data points, including customer behavior, […]