What are the most popular reasons editors usually reject your paper for?

Rejection hurts! Especially if it involved rigorous hard work for a long period of time with many author’s contributions. There can be several reasons for rejection of the manuscript, such as overlooking of journal’s scope, understanding the communications made by the editor can ascertain the reason for failure.

The technical reason for journal Rejection!

  • Plagiarized content in the manuscript

Copying other’s work as own is ethically incorrect. Nowadays, publishing houses are very stringent about the authenticity of the work and take advanced measures to keep it checked prior to the publication of the article.

  • Lack of Authenticity

The editor can reject your article if you have exactly reproduced the work already published. As it shall be boring for the authors and hence not the “cup of tea” for the journal.

  • Inessential Publication

In case you try to publish what u have already published or the majority of work the article quotes your previous work then very likely the editor will reject the paper.

  • Lack of Worldwide significance of the content

The majority of the journal specifies in their aim and scope, regarding the global audience base. Hence, the article should be well framed keeping in mind the worldwide perspective.

  • Multiple submission of the manuscript to different journals

The author should make sure after getting a clear NO from one journal shall opt for other as multiple submission is a potential danger to your reputation and career. Furthermore, is a wastage of the reviewer’s time, also you have delayed someone else’s chances of manuscript assessment.

  • The core component of manuscripts such as materials and methods or results are missing

Each section is equally important as all cords joined can only make a sensible story.

  • Figures and Table are blurred

The data is the evidence of the stated hypothesis.

Hence, following the needed journal’s guidelines in the content of figure, table, graph, chart formatting is crucial for the audience’s clarity.

  • Non-accordance with the journal Guild lines

Journal has guidelines stating the format in which the manuscript should be arranged, be it the font, line and page numbering, or Vancouver style for reference citation. Sometimes, Highlights or graphical abstract is demanded by the journal to accomplish publication. The author should be well aware of the Journal specification and shall abide by it.

  • Manuscript Length

Poor fit with journal guidelines for manuscript length in terms of the type of paper can reject the article. For instance, a research article that should be no more than 5000 words including abstract, main text, and reference should be stringently followed to avoid rejection.

Topic lacks accordance with Journal’s audience

The content in the manuscript does not suit the audience or reader of the journal can lead to journal rejection.

Manuscript interpretation is difficult

Sometimes the author wants to convey his study but lacks the ability to put forward the results or the theme in an appropriate way. Also, the author loses the flow or consistency during the course of execution of research as result the interpretation and correlation among the results to build a story gets distorted.

Lack of concrete hypothesis in the “introduction” of the manuscript

The hypothesis or question behind the work is missing. Very often, the hypothesis doesn’t fit with the content of the paper or is poorly formulated.

Inaccurate data interpretation and result analysis

There can be flaws in the methods and material or the sampling. Significance value and statistical analysis calculation can be incorrect.

Flaws in language, and writing style

Grammatical correct and scientifically appropriate words are critical and important aspects of scientific writing. The idea or theme of the paper along with the results should be presented incorrect language. Peer review by friends, family, and colleagues can contribute in an effective way towards scientific writing. Editing services can be a great help by providing writing assistance. For, instance “Reseapro” a well know client service provider can give a new refreshing look to the manuscript by providing assistance in terms of substantive editing, copy editing, and even rewriting the manuscript. Also,  the decision-making in terms of “what type of correction can make an article get published” is also addressed by taking insights from experienced editors.

Inappropriate referencing style

Formatting of text citation and bibliography of the manuscript needs the following styling guide with a precision of on the dot.

The discussion and conclusion should justify the objectivity of the work

The discussion is the climax of the manuscript. It should justify the objective of the paper by giving a valid and in-context explanation of the results.  Furthermore, should render scope for further research. Conclusion, on the other hand, represents summary in a compact way with specific and context-appropriate information of the manuscript.

Journal is highly selective with plenty of good ones piled up

Sometimes journal already has plenty of good copies lined up and may reject a not so-so work if it has a more promising one on a similar topic. Sometimes, the research submitted is a very common topic and has already been published extensively in recent issues and hence may not be prioritized.

Ethical dispute

Ethical clearance is a must for successful publication. Patient consent forms or documents supporting ethical committee clearance while conducting experiments on animals are highly valued pieces of evidence that speak about the authenticity of the work.

Conclusion: Manuscript Rejection table is governed by multiple factors. A careful and thorough assessment of the editorial communication can render insights toward the needed measures to be taken for attainting authorship.

Most Common Reasons for Journal Editors Rejecting Paper

Rejection is unpleasant for everyone since it is demotivating. Even top scientists have encountered rejection in their carrier. Academic publishing, on the other hand, is rife with rejection. Any script could be rejected for multiple causes, which could be grouped into two categories: technical and editorial.

Technical reasons 

Fragmented information, like narrow sample size or missing or ineffective controls

The data obtained from the investigation is inadequate to form the conclusion stated in the manuscript. If the size of the taken sample is tiny or the control isn’t distinct, this can happen. If the obtained data doesn’t support the hypothesis of a paper, rejection is inevitable.

Poor analysis like using improper statistical tests or nonexistence of statistics altogether

At the time of research and scientific study, statistical analysis of the gathered results is of utmost importance. Choosing a suitable statistical technique to examine the research findings, alternatively, can be puzzling. The acquired outcomes are doubtful because of inappropriate analysis and the use of an unproductive technique.

Unsuitable procedure for replying to the hypothesis or using a timeworn methodology

Using an outdated research methodology while innovative methods promise further precise results will result in rejection. The most likely conclusion will be that the results collected are faulty because there are better means to carry out the research.

Editorial reasons

Out of scope

Each journal has a well-defined goal and scope, which may be seen on their website. Early-career researchers frequently miss this step and submit manuscripts to journals without considering if their work provides value to the publication and its audience.

Inadequate impact/quality of research

If the paper’s topic isn’t of curiosity to the audience of the journal, it will very certainly be rejected. It could also be that the paper’s findings are not up to the mark, or that the manuscript is clearly part of a larger study that has been divided up to make as many articles as possible.

Ignoring research ethics like signed patients’ consent from or approval from an ethics committee

Papers that deal with ethical issues or appear to be based on unethical behavior, particularly those that do not approach these issues with a critical eye are unlikely to be accepted.

Absence of appropriate formatting necessities

In general, authors do not read/follow the clearly stated guidelines or the ‘house-style.’ For example, incorrect citation style is a common mistake that stands out right immediately. Another quite easy-to-spot manuscript is one that has probably been rejected a number of times previously, not revised, and the submission feels like the authors have decided ‘any journal, will do.

Nonexistence of current references or prevalence of self-citations

The content of the article must be supported by up-to-date references, failing which the paper will be rejected by the journal editor. Furthermore, the number of self-employed people has increased.

Poor technical Language in writing the paper

Some of the rejections are due to poor language quality, which makes it difficult for readers to understand. Rejection will also occur if there is insufficient detail for readers to adequately comprehend and replicate the authors’ findings and experiments.

Conclusion

Journals reject papers for publication for a variety of reasons, some owing to the research quality or paper, and others because of wholly needless causes such as mismatch with the journal. Furthermore, even high-quality articles are frequently rejected by journals due to space limits or other concerns. The above-mentioned reasons are some of the most common reasons for rejection, but not all. Other reasons include lack of space for more publication; the journal may have published another paper with similar research and does not wish to revisit the field and publication bias.