Most Common Reasons for Journal Editors Rejecting Paper

Rejection is unpleasant for everyone since it is demotivating. Even top scientists have encountered rejection in their carrier. Academic publishing, on the other hand, is rife with rejection. Any script could be rejected for multiple causes, which could be grouped into two categories: technical and editorial.

Technical reasons 

Fragmented information, like narrow sample size or missing or ineffective controls

The data obtained from the investigation is inadequate to form the conclusion stated in the manuscript. If the size of the taken sample is tiny or the control isn’t distinct, this can happen. If the obtained data doesn’t support the hypothesis of a paper, rejection is inevitable.

Poor analysis like using improper statistical tests or nonexistence of statistics altogether

At the time of research and scientific study, statistical analysis of the gathered results is of utmost importance. Choosing a suitable statistical technique to examine the research findings, alternatively, can be puzzling. The acquired outcomes are doubtful because of inappropriate analysis and the use of an unproductive technique.

Unsuitable procedure for replying to the hypothesis or using a timeworn methodology

Using an outdated research methodology while innovative methods promise further precise results will result in rejection. The most likely conclusion will be that the results collected are faulty because there are better means to carry out the research.

Editorial reasons

Out of scope

Each journal has a well-defined goal and scope, which may be seen on their website. Early-career researchers frequently miss this step and submit manuscripts to journals without considering if their work provides value to the publication and its audience.

Inadequate impact/quality of research

If the paper’s topic isn’t of curiosity to the audience of the journal, it will very certainly be rejected. It could also be that the paper’s findings are not up to the mark, or that the manuscript is clearly part of a larger study that has been divided up to make as many articles as possible.

Ignoring research ethics like signed patients’ consent from or approval from an ethics committee

Papers that deal with ethical issues or appear to be based on unethical behavior, particularly those that do not approach these issues with a critical eye are unlikely to be accepted.

Absence of appropriate formatting necessities

In general, authors do not read/follow the clearly stated guidelines or the ‘house-style.’ For example, incorrect citation style is a common mistake that stands out right immediately. Another quite easy-to-spot manuscript is one that has probably been rejected a number of times previously, not revised, and the submission feels like the authors have decided ‘any journal, will do.

Nonexistence of current references or prevalence of self-citations

The content of the article must be supported by up-to-date references, failing which the paper will be rejected by the journal editor. Furthermore, the number of self-employed people has increased.

Poor technical Language in writing the paper

Some of the rejections are due to poor language quality, which makes it difficult for readers to understand. Rejection will also occur if there is insufficient detail for readers to adequately comprehend and replicate the authors’ findings and experiments.

Conclusion

Journals reject papers for publication for a variety of reasons, some owing to the research quality or paper, and others because of wholly needless causes such as mismatch with the journal. Furthermore, even high-quality articles are frequently rejected by journals due to space limits or other concerns. The above-mentioned reasons are some of the most common reasons for rejection, but not all. Other reasons include lack of space for more publication; the journal may have published another paper with similar research and does not wish to revisit the field and publication bias.

Writing Sequential Numerical References for a Research Paper

Reference list: Introduction

A formal reference is a published or unpublished source from which information is sought while writing a research paper. A reference list is a list of the information used in the original paper, sorted in the order in which it occurred. It is normally found in the last part of the paper, nevertheless, it can also be found as a footnote or an endnote.

Significance of a Citing your Sources

Referencing is essential for conducting excellent research and for your readers to understand how you conducted your research. Knowing why you need to reference can help you see why it’s critical to know how to reference.

Types of Reference/Citation Styles

A citation style specifies the material that must be included in a citation, as well as the order in which the information is presented, as well as punctuation and another formatting. There are a variety of methods for citing sources from your research. The citation style used can vary depending on the academic discipline.

There are four referencing techniques or conventions that are regularly utilized. The Modern Languages Association, the American Psychological Association, the Harvard, and the Modern Humanities Research Association are the four systems. Further styles used in styling include Oxford, Chicago and Vancouver (numeric).

Numeric style of Reference format

Vancouver is a numbered style. In Vancouver referencing, every data/information is assigned a number that relates to the sequence same as it appears in the text, which is a numeric reference style. The same number is used if the same source is mentioned more than once in the text.

Using references in the manuscript as citations (i.e. in-text citations)

You can enter the number in brackets or as a superscript when adding an in-text citation to your document. Whichever option you use, be sure you maintain consistency throughout your work. e.g. (1) or [1] or 1.

Include the citation number for each piece of work if you want to cite more than one source in a sentence. To connect two integers, use a hyphen. g. There are many studies that have examined the effect of alcohol on cognitive impairment (1,3, 4-7, 9).

Example: These findings were in agreement with the results of previous studies [2,22-24]. It is noteworthy that some researchers have reported that BMI does not correlate with H. pylori incidence [8,23].

Listing references (i.e. reference list at the end of the paper)

It is not necessary to mention the author in the citation in the text while using the Vancouver style, but you must include the author in your reference list at the conclusion. This list appears at the end of the paper, in numerical order same as it appeared in the text.

Example: Pattnaik K, Das K. Property rights, control, and the performance of firms in Indian industry. Journal of Economics 2019;42(1): 109-138.

HOW TO REUSE OLD ACADEMIC PAPERS

While pursuing a career or academic research and publication, it is only natural to expect academicians to develop on their previous works or pursue a set line of investigation. More often than not, research or experimental investigation spans over years and researchers may indulge in multiple publications on the matter which builds on their previous works.

However, reusing one’s own previous publication is a taboo that comes under the ambit of self-plagiarism. This is a great dilemma that is strongly challenged by many academicians who argue using one’s own work is not ethically plagiarism. However, there are certain limitations on how one can use one’s previous works, and therefore one has to be careful about how to use them.

What is the Concern?

To best understand why there are limitations to text recycling, one has to understand the reason why it is restricted. Many unscrupulous authors have been scoring multiple publications by simply rehashing the same content over and over again. This was red-flagged in the academic community, as these publications go against the ethics of academic publication. They do not offer new value or insights on the subject; they are not pushing the boundary of knowledge; they are just done for the base intention of having more publication credits or citation.

How to reuse your own content?

However, there is a genuine case of reusing one’s own content for legitimate reasons and that too is well understood. To avoid the vice of multiple publications, there are some checks and balances suggested.

The context: The context of text recycling is the most defining factor. You may have done a certain publication says while reporting your own findings. Tomorrow, you are looking to develop a review article in which you want to posit your own findings with other publications. In this case, you may definitely refer to your previous content, but it needs to be edited to fit the present context. You cannot simply copy-paste from the previous publication as it does very little value added to the news article. Edit, paraphrase, and contextualize the previous content and you can avoid the pitfall of self-plagiarism.

Citation: Even if you are using your own content, you have to ensure proper referencing and citation as you would for any other literature review. Offer the content as something you have already published before and not as something you are offering now. You also need to develop a logical flow that justifies these citations, or else you may be found guilty of just recycling text to cover up for lack of original content for the new article.

Journal selection: Journal selection is critical for articles recycling text. If you are looking to publish a series of articles in a specific journal, then referring to previous publications via recycling text has a certain context. If you are submitting articles to various journals with recycling text, it may be red-flagged under self-plagiarism.

Remembers, reusing own content is not a crime; the crime lies in the dishonesty involved in the process.

How to Promote Your articles and Track them

Getting a journal publication is an achievement; but letting the world know about it is essential for career progression. In the academic world flooded with numerous publications, it is important to promote your work amongst your peers and professional colleagues.

At the same time, it is also important to keep track of the reach and impact of your article. The real merit of a publication is not just the number of reads but also number of citation and recall of the article.

Here are some important tools to promote your article and keep track of it.

  • Normally journals share pdf of published articles which one can share via mail to colleagues and targeted audiences. Do ensure to ask the journals to provide your e-mail id or professional account links in your profile. You can also share digital links of the articlewhich increases chances of clicks and thereby online readership of your article.
  • It is advisable to share printed copies of the article with seniors, peers and especially those whose articles you have used as citation in your own article,along with a short note of introduction or expressing gratitude, as the case may be. Sharing physical copies also raises chances of citation for your own article, and it is a good way of getting acquainted in the peer group.
  • Regularly update your university web page, your personal professional accounts or blogs with your publications. Share short briefs of your research with keywords. This will help your profile be highlighted in general Google searches on the field of you your research by other academicians unknown to you.
  • Use social media platforms for outreach. LinkedIn, Twitter posts or blogs are useful means of promoting one’s article. You can also post links of your article on general online platforms or blogs where you interact with other academicians for online discussions on research Use hashtags or keywords to link your article to relevant topics.
  • It is advisable to get an ORCID registration for yourself. ORCID or Open Research and Contributor ID is a unique ID for every individual which can then be used to track all publications and citation This helps avoid confusions over names, referencing, or mistaken identification. By registering and using an ORCID ID you can easily distinguish yourself and assure that your work is attributed only to yourself.
  • While there exist other platforms and databases which cover a portion of your total output (e.g. Scopus or Web of Science), or only certain types of outputs (e.g. journal articles), you can add all of your publications, works and activities to your ORCID record to create a comprehensive listing in one place, including outputs like datasets, peer review activities and more.

Besides accounts in such platforms, it is also advisable to create a simple Google alert for yourself. This is an easy tool to get records of which all digital platforms are best serving your purpose.

 

Increasing Visibility of Research Paper Using Simple SEO Tricks

What is SEO?

Search Engine Optimization (SEO) refers to the process of ensuring that your manuscript is found by search engines such as Google or PubMed. After all, you’ve spent a lot of time on your research and would want to share your findings with those interested. For this, you need to ensure that readers can find your paper without having to perform difficult searches that could waste their time. Ultimately, you want your findings to have an impact in your field of study and to provide visibility to your research.

Thus, “Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of affecting the visibility of a website or a web page in a web search engine’s unpaid results.” It is the process of maximizing the number of visits made to a particular website by making sure that the website appears high on the list of results returned by a search engine you will increase the chances of visibility if you get a managed wordpress hosting plan.

The same process is followed by a researcher looking for information related to a particular subject or topic. It is the same when search for papers are done on various abstracting sites like PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar. Papers having the searched words in the title and also in the paper are placed sufficiently high in the result list of the search engine; thus increasing the visibility of the research paper. Now the question that comes to mind is: what do I do to put my paper at the top of the search list of the search engine?

Some useful SEO tips

Keywords play a very important role in effective optimization of the search engine results, this is why you should use seo keyword research services. Here are few tips to increase the visibility of your paper:

  • Maintain proper keyword density in the paper.
  • Ensure that the title and subtitles contain the keyword.
  • Use descriptive keywords in titles, abstracts, subheadings, captions, tables, and figures.
  • Make your title concise and informative.
  • Using keywords to convey key concepts.
  • Choose keywords that are frequently searched.
  • Insert links based on the keywords to other relevant websites and social media sites.
  • Select a keyword list and use the keywords and their synonyms as often as possible, but remember not to overdo it as this may have a negative impact on the visibility of the paper.

Keywords improve article’s impact factor

Recognition in your discipline not only ensures that your research will have more impact, but it also increases the reliability and validity of the research paper. Articles that can be easily searched have higher citations than other papers. Higher citations also help increase the credibility and visibility of the researchers, therefore increasing their ranking. Google Scholar uses citation information in determining the positioning of papers in the results. This means that the more citations credited to you and your article, the higher up in the ranks you will go and the more “finds” your article will get.

How to choose the best SEO keywords for your paper?

Keywords play a vital role in SEO and therefore should be chosen carefully. There are some tools that can suggest the best possible keywords for your paper or subject. Some of the tools are:

Google Keyword Planner: Finds keywords and search trends relevant to your field of study.

Google Trends: Tracks a particular search term relative to the total search of a related item.

Keyword Tool: Uses common Google searches to provide keyword suggestions.

In today’s generation, most researchers look for papers on the Internet using keywords; therefore choosing the right keywords for better optimization of the search engine is a must. Visibility of your research paper can be increased using simple SEO tricks or perhaps with an aid of an SEO agency. You need to keep track of the latest trends in keyword usage and choose your keywords accordingly.

Following these simple SEO guidelines can increase the citations of your work and in turn increase your credibility and visibility in your research field.