
The aim of this service is to help in evaluating the suitability of a manuscript purely from a subject experts (peer) point of view, detailing mostly the scientific inadequacy/adequacy/suggestions for improving the manuscript etc. Since no editing is involved, hence, there is no change in your manuscript. We only provide suggestions and expert comments in "Track-change" mode. Some of the questions to be addressed here are:
- Is the Title crisp and catchy to draw attention of the reader?
- Does the Abstract adequately represent the contents of the paper?
- Is the Introduction/background sound and logical as a context for the study?
- Is the research question framed appropriately, i.e., is the motivation of the study clear and concise?
- Is the Methodology described in detail?
- Are the presented data adequate or is there a need for some additional study?
- Whether there is a clear differentiation between Results and Discussion sections.
- Has the Discussion made in relation to the published literature and/or fundamental basis, and is not just a mere repetition of the Results section?
- Do the Conclusions clearly reflect the salient findings of the study?
- Are the references updated and adequate?
Disclaimer
This service does not guarantee acceptance of manuscript for publication but it guides you to improve the quality of your manuscript.
Delivery And Pricing
5 | 150 |
Explore our editor's specialized areas
From Medicine to Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Economics and the Art & Humanities -- our English editing team specializes in 1,117 subject areas.