The aim of this service is to help evaluate the suitability of a manuscript purely from a subject experts (peer) point of view, detailing mostly the scientific inadequacy/adequacy/suggestions for improving the manuscript etc. Since no editing is involved, there is no change in your manuscript. We only provide suggestions and expert comments in "Track-change" mode. Some of the questions to be addressed here are:

•   Is the Title crisp and catchy to draw attention of the reader?
•   Does the Abstract adequately represent the contents of the paper?
•   Is the Introduction/Background sound and logical as a context for the study?
•   Is the research question framed appropriately, i.e., is the motivation of the study clear and concise?
•   Is the Methodology described in detail?
•   Is the presented data adequate or is there a need for additional study?
•   Is there is a clear differentiation between Results and Discussion sections.
•   Is the Discussion made in relation to published literature and/or fundamental basis, or is it just a mere repetition of the Results section?
•   Do the Conclusions clearly reflect the salient findings of the study?
•   Are the references updated and adequate?

Disclaimer

This service does not guarantee acceptance of manuscript for publication but it guides you to improve the quality of your manuscript.