The aim of this service is to help in evaluating the suitability of a manuscript purely from a subject experts (peer) point of view, detailing mostly the scientific inadequacy/adequacy/suggestions for improving the manuscript etc. Since no editing is involved, hence, there is no change in your manuscript. We only provide suggestions and expert comments in "Track-change" mode. Some of the questions to be addressed here are:

• Is the Title crisp and catchy to draw attention of the reader?
• Does the Abstract adequately represent the contents of the paper?
• Is the Introduction/background sound and logical as a context for the study?
• Is the research question framed appropriately, i.e., is the motivation of the study clear and concise?
• Is the Methodology described in detail?
• Are the presented data adequate or is there a need for some additional study?
• Whether there is a clear differentiation between Results and Discussion sections.
• Has the Discussion made in relation to the published literature and/or fundamental basis, and is not just a mere repetition of the Results section?
• Do the Conclusions clearly reflect the salient findings of the study?
• Are the references updated and adequate?